The idea came a few years ago and came accompanied by some controversy about its usefulness. Being able to take a electronic device the size of a standard book all the literature of the Golden Age drew attention, at least, of many fans to read. The first ebooks (or eBooks) came to market in 1998. 11 years later, technology has been refined to the absolute limits and its price has fallen to such an extent that the price of 10 new books on paper, available as an ebook latest model.
Apparently, the idea is set to revolutionize the cultural market. However, as in any revolution, it has a ratio supporters and detractors similar. On the other side of the "friends of ebooks " lovers of literature and technology, those who light up the eyes are just thinking about the mere idea of \u200b\u200bpossessing more literary works of the they will never get to read. In front, the romantics, those who enjoy opening an old book and inhaling the smell of yellowed pages. What seems clear is that this is a change that leaves no one indifferent.
saving space, the tiniest of advantages
Perhaps the first thing someone interested in a ebook it passes through the head is saving space. Power Pack and the dusty National Episodes and make room for a new flat screen TV no longer an incentive to the most technophiles. However, the benefits go further. Why pay Larsson trilogy on the bus going to work when we can fit in a jacket pocket? Not to mention the ability to access all the morning papers at the touch of a button.
Adherents to the new technologies are in the ebooks only advantages. One of them, which some dubbed as demagogue, is on saving paper posed by electronic books. There is no doubt that if all the books published so far done so electronically, the forests of today would be much more lush. Not to mention the financial aspect. For less than 300 euros (price about 10 books in form factor) one can get with the latest ebook . Papyre is just one example:
The cross currency
Classic lovers never quite believed the benefits of ebooks . The main argument used is the lack of image quality, the uncomfortable read hundreds of pages on a screen. However, thanks to the digital ink , has managed to eliminate flickering monitors itself and reduce its usual brightness, so the eye strain is negligible. This technology (also called digital paper), consumes very little energy, so one can read over 10,000 pages for a week without having to recharge your battery.
however, still difficult to find online books in electronic format. As happened a few years ago music in mp3, now easier to download an entire book so lawless free (not illegal) to buy in a store online . The publishers have not yet been updated and are in danger of being left behind, however, Internet users have lost time and, as if they were living at it, have begun to digitize books entirely altruistic.
Skeptics pose another dilemma, this time related to the persistence of the works. Thanks to the paper, you can find first editions of works by Galileo and Kepler. Would it have been the same if they were published only in electronic form? At the end of the day, traditional books are tangible, storable and tangible. The ebooks have the disadvantage be a string of zeros and ones that can not be touched, much less physically store. Are they really a durable?
The carriage of ebooks increasingly filled
As usual with any new technology, large companies already have to wonder about getting your piece of the lance in hand. The ubiquitous Google is going ahead with Google Books , a digital database with millions of works available to anyone for free (and many other paying). The publishers' complaints were not long in coming. Then they saw the giant American business invading and threatening their survival. After a number of cases in 2008 reached an agreement, Google would provide 63% of the revenue from the ebooks to publishing companies. As it never rains please everyone, Alliance Open Book (English) put his stick. For them, this arrangement benefits only to Google, sooner or later, would give it a monopoly on online publications. Still, this is a newly created problem, surely finishing solution according to all parties.
Meanwhile, technology producers have lost standing in this regard. From Sony to Amazon, shop online largest world, have launched their own e-book readers. Such an amount of supply has resulted in an amalgam of incompatible formats (each player is valid for your own ebook format ). For now, just have to wait to see who finally takes the upper hand and impose its law as far as e-books are concerned.
saving space, the tiniest of advantages
Perhaps the first thing someone interested in a ebook it passes through the head is saving space. Power Pack and the dusty National Episodes and make room for a new flat screen TV no longer an incentive to the most technophiles. However, the benefits go further. Why pay Larsson trilogy on the bus going to work when we can fit in a jacket pocket? Not to mention the ability to access all the morning papers at the touch of a button.
Adherents to the new technologies are in the ebooks only advantages. One of them, which some dubbed as demagogue, is on saving paper posed by electronic books. There is no doubt that if all the books published so far done so electronically, the forests of today would be much more lush. Not to mention the financial aspect. For less than 300 euros (price about 10 books in form factor) one can get with the latest ebook . Papyre is just one example:
The cross currency
Classic lovers never quite believed the benefits of ebooks . The main argument used is the lack of image quality, the uncomfortable read hundreds of pages on a screen. However, thanks to the digital ink , has managed to eliminate flickering monitors itself and reduce its usual brightness, so the eye strain is negligible. This technology (also called digital paper), consumes very little energy, so one can read over 10,000 pages for a week without having to recharge your battery.
Skeptics pose another dilemma, this time related to the persistence of the works. Thanks to the paper, you can find first editions of works by Galileo and Kepler. Would it have been the same if they were published only in electronic form? At the end of the day, traditional books are tangible, storable and tangible. The ebooks have the disadvantage be a string of zeros and ones that can not be touched, much less physically store. Are they really a durable?
The carriage of ebooks increasingly filled
As usual with any new technology, large companies already have to wonder about getting your piece of the lance in hand. The ubiquitous Google is going ahead with Google Books , a digital database with millions of works available to anyone for free (and many other paying). The publishers' complaints were not long in coming. Then they saw the giant American business invading and threatening their survival. After a number of cases in 2008 reached an agreement, Google would provide 63% of the revenue from the ebooks to publishing companies. As it never rains please everyone, Alliance Open Book (English) put his stick. For them, this arrangement benefits only to Google, sooner or later, would give it a monopoly on online publications. Still, this is a newly created problem, surely finishing solution according to all parties.
Meanwhile, technology producers have lost standing in this regard. From Sony to Amazon, shop online largest world, have launched their own e-book readers. Such an amount of supply has resulted in an amalgam of incompatible formats (each player is valid for your own ebook format ). For now, just have to wait to see who finally takes the upper hand and impose its law as far as e-books are concerned.
0 comments:
Post a Comment